This statement of the scientific code of ethics is a statement of the code of ethics of all parties involved in the publication process of this scientific journal, namely the manager, editor, bestari partners, and authors. The Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications essentially upholds three ethical values in publications, namely:

1. Neutrality, namely being free from conflicts of interest in managing publications.
2. Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those entitled to be authors.
3. Honesty, namely free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publications.

Publisher's Responsibilities

The publisher of Teknika is responsible for publishing the manuscript after going through the editing, review, and layout process following the publishing rules of scientific journals.

The publisher of Teknika is responsible for ensuring academic freedom for editors and Mitrabestari in carrying out their respective duties.

The publisher of Teknika is responsible for maintaining privacy and protecting intellectual property, copyright, and editorial freedom.

Editorial Responsibilities

Teknika editor is responsible for deciding which manuscripts are suitable for publication through editorial board meetings that refer to applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, duplication, data fabrication, data falsification, and plagiarism.

In the process of reviewing and accepting manuscripts, the Teknika editorial team is based on the principle of equal treatment in making decisions to publish manuscripts without distinguishing between the race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political ideology of the author.

The editors and editorial team of Teknika will not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts or texts unless with permission from the author.

The research editor of  Jurnal Teknika will not use unpublished manuscripts for his purposes and will be returned directly to the author.

Responsibilities of Reviewer

Reviewer of Teknika assists editors in making editorial decisions on incoming manuscripts/manuscripts.

The reviewer of Teknika is responsible for recommendations for the manuscripts they review.

The review of the manuscript is carried out objectively and is supported by clear arguments.

Teknika reviewer is responsible for quotations, references, duplication, data fabrication, data falsification, and plagiarism for the manuscripts it reviews.

Teknika reviewers must always maintain the confidentiality of information and not use information from the manuscripts they review for personal gain/interest.

Author's Responsibilities

The author must honestly present the manuscript with his thoughts or research results without duplication, data fabrication, data falsification, or plagiarism.

The author is responsible for the confirmation submitted for the manuscript that has been written.

The author must indicate references to the opinions and works of other people cited

Authors must write manuscripts ethically, honestly, and responsibly, following applicable scientific writing regulations.

The author does not double-submit to another journal while the Teknika Journal process is ongoing.

The author is okay if the manuscript undergoes editing during the review and layout process without changing the substance or main idea of the writing.